date:
Record modified: 2011-09-08
date:
Record created: 2010-03-31
date:
2008
description:
Title from PDF cover (viewed on Dec. 2, 2008).; Harvested from http://www.soros.org/initiatives/health/focus/law/articles_publications/publications/10reasons_20080918/10reasons_20081201.pdf on Mar. 31, 2009.; Includes bibliographical references (p. 26-28).
description:
Extent: 32 p. : digital, PDF file.
description:
Abstract: Recent years have seen the creation, particularly in parts of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean, of HIV-specific laws that criminalize HIV transmission and exposure. At the same time, particularly in Europe and North America, existing criminal laws are increasingly being used to prosecute people for transmitting HIV or exposing others to HIV infection. The push to apply criminal law to HIV exposure and transmission is often driven by the wish to respond to serious concerns about the ongoing rapid spread of HIV in many countries, coupled by what is perceived to be a failure of existing HIV prevention efforts. These concerns are legitimate. Recently, particularly in Africa, some groups have begun to advocate for criminalization in response to the serious phenomenon of women being infected with HIV through sexual violence or by partners who do not reveal their HIV diagnoses to them. While these issues must be urgently addressed, a closer analysis of the complex issues raised by criminalization of HIV exposure or transmission reveals that criminalization is unlikely to prevent new infections or reduce women's vulnerability to HIV. In fact, it may harm women rather than assist them, and negatively impact both public health and human rights. This document, co-produced by OSI, provides ten reasons why criminalizing HIV exposure or transmission is generally an unjust and ineffective public policy. It has been endorsed by leading HIV/AIDS, human rights, and women's organizations and networks throughout the world.--Publisher description.
identifier:
10reasons_20081201
language:
eng
publisher:
Law and Health Initiative, Open Society Institute, Public Health Program
relation:
OCLC No.: 276988929
relation:
Mode of access: World Wide Web.; System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.
rights:
This work may be protected by copyright. It was originally published on the free Web and has been harvested for preservation purposes under a claim of fair use. Please consult the work itself for additional statements regarding copyright ownership and permissions. Access to this work is provided here for educational purposes only. If you are a copyright owner who objects to the preservation of your work in this fashion, or if you believe that your copyright has been violated by the project's efforts, please contact the Georgetown University Law Library.
source:
http://www.soros.org/initiatives/health/focus/law/articles_publications/publications/10reasons_20080918/10reasons_20081201.pdf
subject:
Sexually transmitted diseases--Law and legislation.
subject:
Medical care--Law and legislation--Criminal provisions.
subject:
Liability (Law)
subject:
HIV-positive persons--Legal status, laws, etc.
subject:
HIV infections--Transmission--Criminal provisions.
subject:
HIV infections--Social aspects.
subject:
Criminal justice, Administration of.
subject:
AIDS (Disease)--Transmission--Criminal provisions.
subject:
AIDS (Disease)--Social aspects.
title:
10 reasons to oppose the criminalization of HIV exposure or transmission
type:
application/pdf
type:
PDF-1.4
title:
10 reasons to oppose the criminalization of HIV exposure or transmission
publisher:
Law and Health Initiative, Open Society Institute, Public Health Program
date:
Record modified: 2011-09-08
date:
Record created: 2010-03-31
date:
2008
description:
Title from PDF cover (viewed on Dec. 2, 2008).; Harvested from http://www.soros.org/initiatives/health/focus/law/articles_publications/publications/10reasons_20080918/10reasons_20081201.pdf on Mar. 31, 2009.; Includes bibliographical references (p. 26-28).
description:
Extent: 32 p. : digital, PDF file.
description:
Abstract: Recent years have seen the creation, particularly in parts of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean, of HIV-specific laws that criminalize HIV transmission and exposure. At the same time, particularly in Europe and North America, existing criminal laws are increasingly being used to prosecute people for transmitting HIV or exposing others to HIV infection. The push to apply criminal law to HIV exposure and transmission is often driven by the wish to respond to serious concerns about the ongoing rapid spread of HIV in many countries, coupled by what is perceived to be a failure of existing HIV prevention efforts. These concerns are legitimate. Recently, particularly in Africa, some groups have begun to advocate for criminalization in response to the serious phenomenon of women being infected with HIV through sexual violence or by partners who do not reveal their HIV diagnoses to them. While these issues must be urgently addressed, a closer analysis of the complex issues raised by criminalization of HIV exposure or transmission reveals that criminalization is unlikely to prevent new infections or reduce women's vulnerability to HIV. In fact, it may harm women rather than assist them, and negatively impact both public health and human rights. This document, co-produced by OSI, provides ten reasons why criminalizing HIV exposure or transmission is generally an unjust and ineffective public policy. It has been endorsed by leading HIV/AIDS, human rights, and women's organizations and networks throughout the world.--Publisher description.
subject:
Sexually transmitted diseases--Law and legislation.
subject:
Medical care--Law and legislation--Criminal provisions.
subject:
Liability (Law)
subject:
HIV-positive persons--Legal status, laws, etc.
subject:
HIV infections--Transmission--Criminal provisions.
subject:
HIV infections--Social aspects.
subject:
Criminal justice, Administration of.
subject:
AIDS (Disease)--Transmission--Criminal provisions.
subject:
AIDS (Disease)--Social aspects.
relation:
OCLC No.: 276988929
relation:
Mode of access: World Wide Web.; System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.
type:
application/pdf
type:
PDF-1.4
source:
http://www.soros.org/initiatives/health/focus/law/articles_publications/publications/10reasons_20080918/10reasons_20081201.pdf
language:
eng
rights:
This work may be protected by copyright. It was originally published on the free Web and has been harvested for preservation purposes under a claim of fair use. Please consult the work itself for additional statements regarding copyright ownership and permissions. Access to this work is provided here for educational purposes only. If you are a copyright owner who objects to the preservation of your work in this fashion, or if you believe that your copyright has been violated by the project's efforts, please contact the Georgetown University Law Library.
identifier:
10reasons_20081201
