120 Cline v Tacoma Stove Co Respondents

Object Type: Asset
In Folder: Supreme Court Briefs

Expand to show object metadata

120 Cline v Tacoma Stove Co Respondents

Dublin Core Metadata

title: Henry H Cline, Appellant, vs The Tacoma Stove Co Appellees, Appellees' motions and argument

title: 120

creator: The Tacoma Stove Company

contributor: Marshall K. Snell

date: 1890-10

publisher: Washington State Supreme Court

type: Civil

type: Personal Restraint Petition

subject: Remedies

subject: Civil Rights

language: eng

format: application/pdf

description: Prior History: Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. Arrest in Civil Actions – Appeal – An order of arrest in civil actions is not a special proceeding, but is a provisional remedy, merely ancillary to the action in which it is invoked, and consequently not appealable under the act (Laws 1889-90, pp. 333, 336) providing that “an appeal may be taken to the supreme court from the superior courts in all actions and proceedings,” as the term “proceedings” embraces only special proceedings, as distinguished from ordinary actions at law.

relation: Cline v. Tacoma Stove Co., 2 Wash. 164 (1891)

relation: 26 P. 192

relation: see also briefs for: Cline v. Harmon, 2 Wash. 155 (1891)

rights: These materials are public records. Please see Washington State Court Rules: General Rules 31 for details https://www.courts.wa.gov/court_rules/pdf/GR/GA_GR_31_00_00.pdf

Show more ▼