103 Reed v Tacoma Bldg and Sav Assn Appellants Reply

Object Type: Asset
In Folder: Supreme Court Briefs

Expand to show object metadata

103 Reed v Tacoma Bldg and Sav Assn Appellants Reply

Dublin Core Metadata

title: Alexander Reed and Louise D Reed, his wife, Plaintiffs in error vs The Tacoma Building and Savings Association Defendants in error, Brief for Plaintiff in reply.

title: 103

creator: Alexander Reed

creator: Louise D. Reed

contributor: Doolittle

contributor: Pritchard

contributor: Stevens

date: 1890-09-19

publisher: Washington State Supreme Court

type: Civil

subject: Real Estate

language: eng

format: application/pdf

description: Prior History: Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.Ejectment by the Tacoma Building & Savings Association against Alexander Reed and Louise D. Reed, his wife. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.Boundaries – Description in Deed – Presumption – Evidence – Where a deed describes the land conveyed as commencing at a point west of the northeast corner of a certain section, the presumption is that the point is due west, although the north line of the section is not on the true meridian; but such presumption may be rebutted by extraneous testimony.

relation: Reed v. Tacoma Bldg. & Sav. Ass'n, 2 Wash. 198 (1891)

relation: 26 P. 252

rights: These materials are public records. Please see Washington State Court Rules: General Rules 31 for details https://www.courts.wa.gov/court_rules/pdf/GR/GA_GR_31_00_00.pdf

Show more ▼