title:
A constitutional analysis of Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and voluntary school integration policies
creator:
Ancheta, Angelo.
publisher:
Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race & Justice, Harvard Law School
date:
Record modified: 2011-09-08
date:
Record created: 2008-08-11
date:
Issued: 2007
description:
Extent: 28 p. : digital, PDF file.
description:
Abstract: This paper examines the Seattle and Louisville cases and discusses their impact on K-12 education and constitutional doctrine. The analysis is divided into three parts. Part I examines the Justices' opinions in Parents Involved in Community Schools and discusses the constitutional boundaries for voluntary race-conscious integration policies established by the Court. Part II discusses the implications of the cases in creating and implementing K-12 policies designed to avoid racial isolation and to promote educational diversity. Part III assesses the impact of the cases on equal protection doctrine and race-conscious policy making more generally.
description:
"December 2007."; http://www.charleshamiltonhouston.org/assets/documents/publications/Ancheta%20-%20Constitution%20Analysis%20of%20PICS.pdf on Aug. 11, 2008.; Title from title screen (viewed Aug. 11, 2008).; Includes bibliographical references.
subject:
School integration--Law and legislation--United States.; Affirmative action programs in education--Law and legislation--United States.; Multicultural education--United States.; Minorities--Education--United States.; Educational law and legislation--United States.
relation:
OCLC No.: 243467379
relation:
Mode of access: World Wide Web.; System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.
type:
application/pdf
type:
Text
type:
PDF-1.4
source:
http://www.charleshamiltonhouston.org/assets/documents/publications/Ancheta%20-%20Constitution%20Analysis%20of%20PICS.pdf
language:
eng
rights:
This work may be protected by copyright. It was originally published on the free Web and has been harvested for preservation purposes under a claim of fair use. Please consult the work itself for additional statements regarding copyright ownership and permissions. Access to this work is provided here for educational purposes only. If you are a copyright owner who objects to the preservation of your work in this fashion, or if you believe that your copyright has been violated by the project's efforts, please contact the Georgetown University Law Library.
identifier:
ancheta
